Multi-agent systems
Agents that coordinate on a task, with the orchestration and state handling that keep them predictable instead of chaotic.
AI agent development company
We build AI agents that do real work, not chatbots that fall over the moment a task gets complicated. Retrieval-grounded, evaluated, with guardrails, and deployed as real services. You can read our public agent repositories before you decide.

The proof
What you actually get
Agents that are dependable because they are well-engineered underneath, not because the demo happened to go well.
Agents that coordinate on a task, with the orchestration and state handling that keep them predictable instead of chaotic.
Agents that act on your systems through constrained tools, with audit trails so you can see exactly what they did.
Agents that answer from your data, standing on retrieval we built and wrote up in public.
The limits, grounding, and eval loop that keep an agent safe in production and catch regressions before your users do.
Where it fits
Not every task needs an agent. The ones that do are the messy, multi-step jobs a single prompt cannot hold together: reading from several systems, deciding what to do next, and acting on it. These are the ones we build for.
Agent lane
Agents that answer from your own documentation and data, escalate when they are unsure, and stay inside the actions you allow. Grounded, so the answer is yours, not the model's guess.
Agent lane
The repetitive operations that quietly eat your team's week: triage, data entry across systems, routing, reconciliation. The agent handles the path, a human approves what matters.
Agent lane
Agents that gather from many sources, compare, and summarize with citations, so the output is checkable rather than a confident paragraph you have to take on trust.
Agent lane
Pulling structured data out of documents, email, and PDFs at volume, with the validation that stops a wrong field from flowing downstream into everything else.
Have an agent to build?
Production safeguards
A demo agent and a production agent are different animals. The demo works because the path was happy and the data was clean. Production is neither. These are the failure modes we engineer against from the start, not after the first incident.
An ungrounded agent fills gaps with plausible fiction. We constrain answers to retrieved, cited context, so when it does not know, it says so instead of inventing.
An agent with open-ended access will eventually take an action you did not intend. We give it a constrained set of tools, human checkpoints on anything costly or irreversible, and an audit trail of every step.
A prompt tweak or a model update can regress an agent with nobody noticing until users do. An eval harness with golden sets catches the regression before release, not after.
Loops, retries, and oversized context turn into a bill and a timeout. We build in budgets, timeouts, and provider-agnostic routing, so you choose cost against capability per task.
Engineering stack
An agent without an eval loop is a liability with a friendly tone. We build the measurement and the guardrails in.
Want a cost and timeline range first? Try the estimator
From scope to service
A short, honest process, the same whether you bring us in as a dedicated team, an outsourced build, or a hybrid of both.
A short call to pin down what the agent needs to do, what it can touch, and where a human stays in the loop. We would rather cut scope than over-build.
Most useful agents stand on retrieval. We build the grounding first, over your data, so the agent reasons from something real.
The orchestration, the tools, and the guardrails, with the limits and the audit trail built in rather than bolted on afterwards.
Golden sets and retrieval-precision checks, so we can show it works and catch it the moment it stops.
Into production as a real service, with the observability to see what it actually does once real users touch it.
Straight answers
What buyers usually want to know before the first scoping call.
We maintain public multi-agent repositories you can read, and we published a full teardown of the retrieval layer most agents depend on. The proof is code and writeups, not slides.
Usually both. Retrieval is the layer under most useful agents, so we build them together: grounded retrieval first, then the agent that reasons over it.
Guardrails, constrained tool use, grounding, and evaluation. The agent acts within limits you set, on cited context, and an eval harness catches regressions before release.
LangGraph for orchestration, with OpenAI and Anthropic models behind a provider-agnostic layer so you can route by cost, capability, or a self-hosting requirement.
It moves with how many systems it touches and how tight the compliance bar is. A scoped pilot is usually weeks, not months. We start with the smallest version that proves the value, then expand from there.
The range moves with scope, integrations, and the compliance bar. You can get a fast, honest range from our estimator, and every real number is scoped on a call rather than pulled from air.
Yes. Grounding runs on your data under your constraints, and a provider-agnostic model layer means we can route or self-host where a requirement calls for it. We review your data handling before a line of code ships.
Yes. We build inside your codebase and your systems rather than asking you to start over. The agent plugs into what you already run.
A short call to scope what the agent needs to do and what it can touch, then we agree the model and timeline.